Department of Education Vacates Controversial Title IX Provision

The rule prohibited Title IX investigators from using evidence or statements from involved parties who did not undergo cross-examination.

Department of Education Vacates Controversial Title IX Provision

The U.S. Department of Education announced on Aug. 24 it will stop enforcing a new rule in the 2020 Title IX regulations that prohibits decision-makers in sexual misconduct investigations from using evidence or statements from someone who did not participate in cross-examination at a live hearing.

According to the rescinded rule, which was part of major provisions released by the department in May 2020, statements made by parties that are not cross-examined cannot be relied on to determine guilt. This now-retracted part of the regulations has received significant criticism from advocates for sexual assault survivors who say live questioning could re-traumatize victims and prevent victims from coming forward.

The decision comes after a ruling by a federal district court in Massachusetts last month said the provision was arbitrary and capricious, according to a press release from the department. Shortly after, the court issued a subsequent order indicating its decision applied nationwide.

This change will allow decision-makers to consider evidence from involved parties who did not undergo cross-examinations, including police reports, medical reports, Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner documents, and emails and text messages sent leading up to the alleged misconduct. The department plans to issue a proposed replacement rule next May.

All 2020 regulations are currently under review per President Joe Biden’s March 8 Executive Order calling for the department to assess the Trump administration’s changes. The process of changing the Title IX regulations could take years because they were instituted through the formal rulemaking process, reports NBC News. The OCR says it anticipates publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the regulations. The public will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments.

Some states have sued to overturn the new regulations, including 18 State Attorneys General, who filed a lawsuit against former U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and department.

Here’s a full summary of the major provisions.

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author

amy rock headshot

Amy is Campus Safety’s Executive Editor. Prior to joining the editorial team in 2017, she worked in both events and digital marketing.

Amy has many close relatives and friends who are teachers, motivating her to learn and share as much as she can about campus security. She has a minor in education and has worked with children in several capacities, further deepening her passion for keeping students safe.

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety Conference promo