Revised Title IX Regulations Are Finally Here: What Has Changed and What to Do Next
Three legal experts explain two major Title IX revisions and the steps schools must take to meet the Aug. 1 compliance deadline.
Three legal experts explain two major Title IX revisions and the steps schools must take to meet the Aug. 1 compliance deadline.
In part, the new Title IX regulations will prevent schools from suspending athletes accused of sexual misconduct while officials investigate complaints against them.
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled the accuser is not immune because the accused had fewer rights during Yale’s disciplinary process than he would have had in criminal court.
Michael Stevens, 47, was allegedly communicating with an undercover officer he believed was a 15-year-old girl.
A judge ruled the plaintiff, who filed a lawsuit against MIT after he was expelled, must either file under his real name or dismiss the suit.
A federal judge also dismissed a lawsuit filed against the University of Northern Colorado by a student accused of sexual misconduct.
The Protection from Retaliation policy was updated after an investigation into sexual harassment claims against ex-Provost Martin Philbert.
The dean and associate dean of the University of Montana’s law school are resigning in response to allegations they ignored or mishandled claims of sexual assault and misconduct.
The judge ruled the lawsuits can’t move forward because the statute of limitations for criminal rape cases in Ohio is 20 years.
The rule prohibited Title IX investigators from using evidence or statements from involved parties who did not undergo cross-examination.