CORRECTION: Effectively Responding to Active Shooters in Healthcare Facilities

“Secure, Preserve, Fight” can be an alternative way to respond to active shooters in healthcare settings when “Run, Hide, Fight” is not possible.

CORRECTION: Effectively Responding to Active Shooters in Healthcare Facilities

CORRECTION: This article has been corrected to reflect that that there were a total of 250 active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2017. The original version of this article reported that there were 250 healthcare active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2017. 


Active shooter incidents have been on the rise throughout the United States. The most recent FBI data has identified 250 active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2017, in which 799 people were killed and an additional 1,418 were wounded. In the first half of that period, there was an average of 6.7 incidents per year. That number has tripled to over 20 incidents per year in the second half of that period. Four percent (10) were in healthcare organizations.*

Additionally, the Annals of Emergency Medicine published a 2012 study that examined all U.S. hospital shootings between 2000 and 2011 in which there was at least one injured victim. It identified 154 incidents in 40 states causing death or injury to a staggering 235 people.

Active shooter events at healthcare facilities are different from schools, shopping malls and commercial businesses for several important reasons:

  1. The active shooter’s motives usually are much more personal, targeted and focused.
  2. Necessary security measures are often harder to undertake.
  3. Healthcare providers feel compelled to stay with their patients.
  4. Certain patients will die without continued life support in ICU’s and operating rooms.
  5. Certain areas of hospitals are not easy to harden or evacuate.
  6. Most hospitals are organized vertically and rely heavily on elevators.
  7. Emergency departments may lock down or shut down during an event.
  8. The violence could end in less than 10 minutes, but the healthcare delivery disruption could be prolonged.
  9. Many healthcare shootings occur at entrances or just outside buildings.
  10. Healthcare facilities cannot easily shut down for training.

In last summer’s excellent article by K. Inaba et.al in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), titled “Active-Shooter Response at a Health Care Facility,” the authors framed a number of key issues that are summarized and updated below. They say the “run, hide, fight” response to an active shooter may work in many venues and for certain areas of hospitals, but healthcare facilities should consider a different approach for areas where “run, hide, fight” is not possible. Certain caregivers who are caring for vulnerable patient populations such as children, the elderly and those relying on life support systems need an alternative approach. K. Inaba et. al’s proposed alternative is for healthcare workers to “secure” the location, “preserve” the life of the patient and oneself and “fight” only if necessary.

Healthcare Must Focus on Prevention and Preparedness

The term “left of boom” comes from our military leaders who were dealing with the terrible damage and carnage caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in recent battle campaigns. They realized that they had to move upstream from the events because investing in protective body armor was not enough to save our troops.

They began focusing on prevention and preparedness in addition to protection. They also learned from each event using performance improvement strategies. Healthcare organizations must take a “left of boom” approach, no matter what strategic framework they use for active shooter events.

Unfortunately, many hospitals and certain outpatient procedural centers are challenged to disrupt their day-to-day operations for this needed education and training; vital services often cannot be fully interrupted. Some of our healthcare leaders describe that trying to work a “left of boom” strategy into operations while they are providing continuous care is like trying to change a tire while driving down the highway.

The “secure, preserve, fight” approach does offer a good strategic framework to reduce potential harm if the work is planned carefully, designed thoughtfully and recurrent training is prioritized. Some planning steps include:

  • Getting entire leadership teams involved in planning.
  • Generate accurate facility floor plans for response planning, training and execution. Develop checklists for necessary actions.
  • Identify major ingress/egress points; identify likely pathways for active shooter travel and provide options for visitor/staff/patient evacuation.
  • Identify areas that cannot be evacuated and must be defended, such as operating rooms, intensive care units, labor and delivery, and procedural rooms where patients are most vulnerable.
  • Undertake target hardening and resilience-building in non-evacuation areas to reduce harm to patients and caregivers.
  • Integrate local police/fire/EMS with internal emergency personnel in planning/training.
  • Identify internal and external rally points or locations where staff can meet for accounting and possible redeployment after the scene is safe.
  • Develop advanced communication procedures with local law enforcement and EMS assets; practice them periodically.
  • Clarify public address announcement statements for when an event is occurring and when there is an “all clear” – use plain language; practice them periodically.
  • Establish recurrent severe bleeding control training across the organization.
  • Create and utilize active shooter multimedia materials for on-boarding and recurrent staff training to maintain readiness.
  • Develop early warning mechanisms to act on behaviors of concern.
  • Consider de-escalation training for staff who interact with patients and the public.

Secure

The “secure” step would entail immediately securing essential life-sustaining treatment areas by barricading or securing all access points from the inside, turning off nonessential lights and equipment; and silencing phones and pagers. Other important steps include:

  • Train staff in situational awareness and decision-making during a crisis.
  • Acquire and train with interior securing or locking devices for access points.
  • Deployment of electronic or mechanical locking devices.
  • Silence device alarms and equipment that may draw attention.
  • Place adequate emergency care supplies such as AEDs within non-evacuation areas; practice with them regularly.
  • Educate and train on evacuation and barricading skills; practice them regularly.
  • Stage necessary emergency equipment in fixed locations, in portable packs and on mobile units such as ballistic shields, evacuation equipment and Go Bags with essential supplies.

Read More Articles Like This… With A FREE Subscription

Campus Safety magazine is another great resource for public safety, security and emergency management professionals. It covers all aspects of campus safety, including access control, video surveillance, mass notification and security staff practices. Whether you work in K-12, higher ed, a hospital or corporation, Campus Safety magazine is here to help you do your job better!

Get your free subscription today!


5 responses to “CORRECTION: Effectively Responding to Active Shooters in Healthcare Facilities”

  1. Maranda Thompson says:

    Is this accurate?

    “The most recent FBI data has identified 250 **healthcare** active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2017, in which 799 people were killed and an additional 1,418 were wounded. In the first half of that period, there was an average of 6.7 incidents per year. That number has tripled to over 20 incidents per year in the second half of that period.”

    https://www.fbi.gov/about/partnerships/office-of-partner-engagement/active-shooter-incidents-graphics

    FBI says 250 active shooter incidents in the US as a whole, with 4% (10) being from healthcare facilities, not 250 healthcare active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2017.

    • Katie Malafronte says:

      Hey Maranda – Thanks for pointing that out to us! Our author fact-checked this and made the correction in the article.

  2. Curt Dooley says:

    This is fantastic! Finally, an article that accurately and eloquently describes the differences between healthcare and standard business preparation, training, and response to active shooters. Kudos to the authors.

  3. Danilo m webb says:

    for me . I would like to get more info. and so to wear it in our hospital in aruba. to protect sick people

  4. Mary says:

    What if you are a provider in the ICU, OR or recovery room? Can you leave your patient if under fire?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety HQ