Baltimore School Board Reconsiders Arming SROs After Shooting

A man entered Frederick Douglass High School last week and shot a special education assistant for disciplining his sister.

Baltimore School Board Reconsiders Arming SROs After Shooting

Under current law, Baltimore school police officers must store their firearms while inside the building during school hours.

After a staff member was shot inside a Baltimore high school last week, the city school board is reconsidering its position on arming school police officers while on duty.

Board members were scheduled to discuss overturning the decision on Tuesday, but it was rescheduled due to bad weather, reports SIW.

Three weeks ago, the board unanimously voted to oppose House Bill 31, which aims to overturn the prohibition on guns on campus. State Del. Cheryl D. Glenn said she could not move forward without local support.

However, now that a Frederick Douglass High School staff member was shot on Friday, the debate is back on the table.

“We’ll reopen the conversation and see if what happened has caused people to change their minds,” said board chair Cheryl Casciani.

Casciani, along with the rest of the 10-member school board, voted to oppose House Bill 31 on Jan. 22.

On Friday, 25-year-old Neil Davis entered the school and shot special education assistant Michael Marks twice. Davis had initially come to confront Marks about disciplining his sister, according to charging documents.

The school was placed on lockdown during the incident, reports the Baltimore Sun. The shooting was confined to the lobby and no students were injured.

Marks, 56, is undergoing treatment at the Maryland Shock Trauma Center.

After shots were fired, police took Davis into custody. The officer on duty at Douglass was unarmed, according to school police union president Sergeant Clyde Boatwright.

The officer’s supervisors, who were at the school on Friday for a conference, were carrying their weapons. Spokeswoman Edie House-Foster says no officer pulled out their firearm.

Presently, school police officers are permitted to carry weapons while patrolling the exterior of school buildings before and after school hours. While inside the building during the day, they are required to securely store their weapons.

Boatwright argues that this arrangement leaves the school in a vulnerable position. He does not want to see Baltimore join the list of schools who experience a mass shooting.

“You’re paying people to be police officers, but you won’t give them all of the tools they need to be police officers,” he said. “It’s a bad policy.”

Those who argue against guns on campus say armed police officers have done little to prevent school shootings in the past. They feel that adding more guns in schools would put students at a higher risk.

“I still do not want guns in schools. To change the decision right now would be a knee-jerk reaction and an admission that listening to parents and kids is just lip-service,” tweeted Jesse Schneiderman, a teacher who was live-tweeting in his classroom during the shooting last week.

In the state of Maryland, Baltimore is the only jurisdiction with a sworn school police force. Local police or sheriff’s departments, who are allowed to carry weapons, patrol the schools in surrounding counties.

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author


Katie Malafronte is Campus Safety's Web Editor. She graduated from the University of Rhode Island in 2017 with a Bachelor's Degree in Communication Studies and a minor in Writing & Rhetoric. Katie has been CS's Web Editor since 2018.

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

4 responses to “Baltimore School Board Reconsiders Arming SROs After Shooting”

  1. John Doe says:

    Campus Safety Magazine should do an article about the San Francisco Community College Police Department which is an unarmed Police Department. With an active shooter as a real treat, what can this department do. I shouldn’t have to worry about my kids at a College.

  2. Katie Malafronte says:


    While we may not have an article specifically about that college or its police department, we have a lot of material on the subject, which you may find helpful. You can find that here:

  3. Rob says:

    Does the school board realize how violent Baltimore has become? Are they playing politics by disarming officers putting the safety of children at risk. It is no brainer to have armed (trained) SRO’s in all schools. Let alone schools in such a dangerous city.

  4. Monica Wilson says:

    I do not understand why they would let the officers carry a weapon while patrolling outside but not allow then to carry while on patrol inside the building. It’s insane not to mention its not safe.

    Our school board in Illinois wants officers to carry but legislation won’t allow it in our public schools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety HQ