Fired Uvalde ISD Chief Has ‘Dishonorable Discharge’ Designation Removed from Record
However, Pete Arredondo still won’t get his job back as chief of police of Uvalde ISD.
UPDATE FEBRUARY 22, 2023: Pete Arredondo — the former Uvalde Independent School District police chief who was fired over his agency’s response to the Robb Elementary School mass shooting last May – has won his appeal to upgrade his termination record.
Although the blemish has been removed from his record, he won’t be able to get his job back, reports ABC News.
In Texas, when a law enforcement officer is fired, the agency responsible for firing them notifies the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement that the termination is dishonorable, general, or honorable. The officer can then appeal the designation. Arredondo appealed his designation in September.
He won the appeal by default judgement, meaning Uvalde ISD didn’t “show up” to fight Arredondo’s appeal.
When he was fired back in August, Arredondo’s lawyer said the proceedings against the former police chief were an “illegal and unconstitutional public lynching.”
ORIGINAL AUGUST 25, 2022 ARTICLE about Arredondo’s firing:
Uvalde, Texas – The Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District’s board of trustees fired Police Chief Pete Arredondo Wednesday over allegations he mishandled the May 24 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School that killed 19 students and two teachers.
The board’s unanimous decision comes after three months of calls for his firing. Arredondo had been on unpaid leave from his position since June 22. His termination is effective immediately.
He’s been heavily scrutinized because nearly 400 law enforcement officers arrived at the scene of the active shooter attack but took 77 minutes before some officers breached the classroom door and actually confronted the gunman.
Arredondo did not attend the board meeting where he was fired. However, his attorney released a scathing 17-page letter defending the police chief, reports PBS News Hour.
The letter claims the chief’s actions saved the lives of other students. It also says that Arredondo warned the district about a variety of security issues in the schools a year before the shooting, reports CBSNews.com. It also alleges he wasn’t the incident commander at the scene and that the proceedings are an “illegal and unconstitutional public lynching.”
Additionally, the letter says the board endangered his life by not allowing him to carry a weapon to the school board meeting.
ABCNews reports that some of the school security issues Arredondo told the district about 15 months before the shooting included:
- Police officers had problems using their radios to communicate in school hallways
- Doors were left open so routinely that he and Uvalde city police had a standing arrangement for dealing with it.
Last year, Arredondo also called for more active shooter training, saying there is so much law enforcement in and around Uvalde that a serious incident would see a massive influx of officers. He feared that influx would cause confusion, ABCNews reports.
Although Arredondo has been fired, parent and community members said “they weren’t done” with the school district or other responding law enforcement agencies. On Monday, an attorney for nine families tied to the shooting served the Uvalde school board with a notice of claim of class/mass action, saying they might sue the district, city officials, and state and federal agencies for $27 billion, alleging negligence and failure to act, reports the Austin American-Statesman.
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!
Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century
This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!
If honorable and dishonorable are the only two designations of discharge, there’s no doubt in my mind which one should apply to his termination. His actions during this terrible event were anything but honorable.