Supreme Court Expands Miranda Rights for Juveniles

The U.S. Supreme Court has expanded Miranda rights for juveniles, issuing a 5-4 decision stemming from a case involving North Carolina officers who had questioned a 13-year-old.

In J.D.B v North Carolina, the high court ruled that police must consider a suspect’s age when deciding whether to provide a Miranda warning, according to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Commonsense reality” is “that children will often feel bound to submit to police questioning when an adult in the same circumstances would feel free to leave,” Justice Sotomayor wrote in her majority opinion.

In its usually cryptic way, the court didn’t say at what young age warnings would have to be given, nor did it say how the officer should translate a conclusion about a suspect’s age into a decision to give a warning.

The case involved a 13-year-old, Chapel Hill boy who was questioned by an officer in uniform behind a closed door at school with the principal on hand telling the boy to do the right thing.

Read the court syllabus.

Related Articles:

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety Conference promo