Achieving Metal Detection Optimization

Answering the following seven questions will put you on the path toward properly installing and using today’s metal detection technology.

1 .What do we want to detect?
Develop a list of the three or four threat objects most likely to be encountered. This information will help a campus determine the sensitivity of its detectors. Note that keys, pens or coins may cause false alarms, particularly in those devices with sensitivity levels that are set very high.

2. What is our desired throughput?
Facilities with a lot of traffic, such as large schools, can find this point quite challenging. The weapons screening process must be fast enough so students, patients, staff, vendors and other campus constituents can get to their destinations in a timely manner, yet device accuracy must be maintained.

Throughput is often affected by:

  • How well the detector operators are trained
  • The number of operators conducting the screening
  • How the screening process is organized
  • The number of zones a portal covers
  • The compliance of those being screened

3. What area(s) must be protected?
Universities often deploy detectors at the entrances of stadiums for athletic events or concerts. Hospitals, particularly in high-crime areas, sometimes deploy this type of equipment outside emergency rooms or other areas prone to incidents. Some K-12 schools, particularly in areas prone to criminal activity, deploy detectors at the entrances of schools, particularly if a threat has been reported. In all types of campuses, handheld detectors can also be deployed for spot checks or when re-inspection is necessary.

4. Where should our detectors be placed?
When possible, metal detection equipment should not be placed near objects that may cause interference. Those objects include:

  • Fluorescent lights
  • Any type of machinery that transmits electromagnetic fields
  • Air ducts with metal components that may expand and contract
  • Plumbing
  • Chain link fences
  • Medium-size and large metallic structures

A detector’s settings should be adjusted to account for these objects.

5. What type of detectors should we purchase?
Multi-zone detectors normally detect threat objects faster because they can pinpoint with greater accuracy a threat object’s location. Although these devices increase throughput speed, they are the most expensive products on the market compared to single-zone and dual-zone detectors.

Single-zone products only inform the operator that there is metal on the body. Dual-zone detectors indicate on which side the metal is located. The operator will then need to remove the individual to another checkpoint to scan his or her entire body — or half of the body if a dual-zone device was used — with a handheld metal detector to locate the offending object.

6. How do we know our systems are working properly?
Vendors normally fine tune the walk-through detectors’ sensitivity settings. Calibration trials can be performed by obtaining items of equal size and material composition to the predetermined threat objects discussed in No. 1. These items should be placed on various parts of the body of a person who then walks through the portal.

A portal might be subjected to 20 walk-through tests per location. It should have a 95 percent pass rate. Those detectors that don’t pass should have their sensitivity levels adjusted.

7. When should we deploy our metal detectors?
Schools may choose to deploy these devices on a daily basis or randomly. When done daily and in the same location, students might find ways to circumvent the process and avoid detection. Other types of campuses may choose to deploy metal detectors only when the risk is elevated (e.g. treating domestic violence patients; rival gang members; forensic patients).

Related Articles:


Robin Hattersley Gray is executive editor of Campus Safety. She can be reached at robin.gray@bobit.com.

To subscribe to the unabridged print version of Campus Safety magazine, click here.

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author

robin hattersley headshot
Contact:

Robin has been covering the security and campus law enforcement industries since 1998 and is a specialist in school, university and hospital security, public safety and emergency management, as well as emerging technologies and systems integration. She joined CS in 2005 and has authored award-winning editorial on campus law enforcement and security funding, officer recruitment and retention, access control, IP video, network integration, event management, crime trends, the Clery Act, Title IX compliance, sexual assault, dating abuse, emergency communications, incident management software and more. Robin has been featured on national and local media outlets and was formerly associate editor for the trade publication Security Sales & Integration. She obtained her undergraduate degree in history from California State University, Long Beach.

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety Conference promo