Student Sexual Assault Survivors Fight for Anonymity

Colleges are demanding that courts release the names of sexual assault victims to the public because they claim anonymity hurts their defense.

Student Sexual Assault Survivors Fight for Anonymity

Can people seek both justice and privacy under Title IX?

As more universities are facing federal Title IX lawsuits, more are asking the court to prohibit the use of pseudonyms. Survivors, however, are fighting to maintain their privacy.

Three former students from Dartmouth College and Florida A&M University (FAMU) sued their schools for monetary damages and better accountability of how the campuses address sexual misconduct and assault.

In court documents, these women are known as, “Jane Doe 2,” “Jane Doe 3,” and “S.B.,” according to CS Monitor. All three said they have suffered sexual violence and that their colleges knew enough to protect them but failed to do so.

Both schools deny allegations of inadequate response to sexual assault claims and are asking the court to reveal the names of the victims in its documents.

The schools claim their defense cases are hindered when pseudonyms are used, which raised the question — can people seek both justice and privacy under Title IX?

This push has sparked debate on how to balance fairness and compassion in the legal system and in educational settings worldwide.

“It certainly has been more common to let cases proceed on pseudonyms,” said Peter Lake, a professor at Stetson University College of Law. He added that the battle to prohibit the use of pseudonyms will continue.

“This has been a persistent question that’s been coming up in Title IX work – preserving some level of privacy or confidentiality … the fear being that if you don’t, it may chill people from going forward,” Lake said.

Over 500 people have signed a petition calling for Dartmouth to withdraw its request. Victims whose identities are released to the public may be subject to immense personal cost, and survivor advocates believe it should remain their choice.

“Survivors who find the courage to report what they endured must be empowered, at all times, to control their privacy in the interest of their mental health,” wrote S.B.’s lawyers, Michael Dolce and Takisha Richardson.

Judge Mark Walter in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida has denied several motions by Florida A&M University to reveal S.B.

“There is absolutely no legitimate public interest in outing a rape victim in a Title IX case,” he wrote in a 2018 decision.

FAMU recently brought their request to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration.

Teri Mastando, an attorney in Alabama, said if the 11th Circuit aggress to hear the matter, it could have “huge implications for Title IX lawsuits.”

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author


Katie Malafronte is Campus Safety's Web Editor. She graduated from the University of Rhode Island in 2017 with a Bachelor's Degree in Communication Studies and a minor in Writing & Rhetoric. Katie has been CS's Web Editor since 2018.

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

One response to “Student Sexual Assault Survivors Fight for Anonymity”

  1. jack burton says:

    “Survivors” eh.

    Not much bias here. How about “alleged victims”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety HQ