Fire Survey: System Maintenance, False Alarm Concerns on the Rise
More than half of university, hospital and K-12 school district fire protection professionals rate system maintenance (57%) and false alarms (53%) as two of their top four campus fire protection concerns.
According to the December 2011 Campus Safety magazine and Center for Campus Fire Safety fire survey, more than half of university, hospital and K-12 school district fire protection professionals rate system maintenance (57%) and false alarms (53%) as two of their top four campus fire protection concerns. Respectively, those are nine and six percentage point increases from the 2010 survey.
System maintenance is particularly troubling for 60% of hospital respondents. This finding correlates with their concerns about system design problems: 28% rate system design flaws as one of their top four concerns. Despite these challenges, only 18% of hospital respondents say they are currently evaluating fire detection systems for possible installations/upgrades at their facility(ies) in the next one to five years. More than one in four (28%) installed a new system in the past year, much like their K-12 brethren (29%).
By contrast, there has been quite a bit of activity in the university fire sector, with 41% of survey respondents saying they are evaluating fire detection systems for possible installations or upgrades. One in five say they are on the fence about new installations or upgrades, while 47% have installed a new system in the past year.
Stakeholder buy-in, however, continues to be a challenge for higher education protection professionals – much more so than K-12 and hospital respondents. Two in five university respondents (40%) indicate “convincing administration/stakeholders of the need for improved fire systems” is a top challenge for them (it’s 25% for hospitals and 24% for K-12 schools/districts). Lack of standardization among disparate types of systems is a significant concern for 26% of higher education respondents and 24% of K-12 respondents, compared to only 11% of hospital survey takers. Additionally, 5% of university respondents say they don’t know how to comply with the Campus Fire Safety Right-to-Know Act.
For K-12 respondents, smoke detection (16%), the potential for terrorism involving firebombs, incendiary devices, etc. (14%) and arson (11%) are much more troubling than they are for universities (9%, 5% and 2% respectively) or hospitals (7%, 9% and 2% respectively).
Top 4 Fire Protection Challenges
(Besides funding and availability of resources)
|Our current system(s) aren’t integrated with our other non-fire systems, such as mass notification||41%|
|Convincing administrators/stakeholders of the need for improved fire systems||34%|
|System design flaws||21%|
|We have many types of fire systems that are not standardized and don’t work well with each other||20%|
|Our facilities are old; doing retrofits will damage the decor||15%|
|Vandalism/pranks resulting in non-functioning or poorly functioning fire detection systems||15%|
|Finding the right integrator to install or upgrade our fire detection system||10%|
|System is not in compliance with fire code (NFPA)||9%|
|Potential for terrorism involving firebombs, incendiary devices, etc.||8%|
The vast majority of hospitals (64%) and universities (59%) have had between one and seven fires in the past three years, and only 20% have had no fires. Nearly half of K-12 schools/districts (47%), however, have had no fires, and another 28% have had one to three fires.
|We are currently evaluating fire detection systems for possible installation/upgrade at our facility(ies) in the next 1-5 years||41%||18%||21%|
|We have installed a fire detection system(s) in the past year||47%||28%||29%|
|We might or might not install a new fire system, depending on circumstances, such as budget, stakeholder buy-in, pending regulations, etc.||20%||9%||11%|
|We have no plans to install a new or upgraded fire system in the near future.||29%||50%||52%|
Note: Respondents could check all answers that apply to them.
About the survey: A short survey was E-mailed to Campus Safety magazine subscribers and members of the Center for Campus Fire Safety, and 513 individuals responded. The margin of error is approximately +4.3% at a 95% confidence level. Campus Safety magazine thanks all of the individuals who particpated in this poll, as well as the Center for Campus Fire Safety. For more information on the center, visit www.campusfiresafety.org.
- Additional 2012 Fire Survey Respondent Comments
- 7 Steps to Reducing False Fire Alarms
- 6 Helpful Hints to Keep in Mind When Selecting a Fire Alarm System
- Incorporating Mass Notification Into New Fire Alarm Systems
- 2010 Fire Survey Results
- 2008 Fire Survey Results
- Your Mass Notification Cheat Sheet
Photo via Flickr, Young Einstein
Add Another Layer of Protection to your Campus
If you’re responsible for protecting a campus — whether at a hospital, K-12 school, college or university — then Campus Safety magazine is a must-read, and it’s free! As the only publication devoted to those public safety, security and emergency management personnel, issues cover all aspects of safety measures, including access control, video surveillance, mass notification, and security staff practices.
Take advantage of a free subscription to Campus Safety today, and add its practical insights, product updates and know-how to your toolkit. Subscribe today!
Campus Safety Heroes
Campus Safety honors those who keep their hospital, school or university campus safer.See our latest Heroes, nominees and content.
Recommended For You
Do you have a Threat Assessment Checklist? If not, you’ll want to download this FREE Active Shooter Checklist now!
Improving emergency preparedness on your campus is an evolving process involving both personnel and equipment. Learn from other school and college officials preparedness and who reveal what they look for in an emergency alert system.