U.S. Supreme Court OKs DNA Swabs During Arrests
Police investigators can routinely collect DNA samples from suspects arrested for a serious crime to solve old cases, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 3.
The 5-4 ruling came in Maryland v. King, where a convicted rapist had argued his Fourth Amendment privacy rights were violated when police used DNA to connect him to an earlier crime. The court reinstated Alonzo King’s conviction for a 2003 rape uncovered after his 2009 arrest for an unrelated assault.
Justice Anthony Kennedy disagreed with King’s contention that the use of DNA evidence constituted a warrantless seizure. He said DNA collection is no different than taking a suspect’s mug shot or fingerprints upon arrest.
In his dissenting opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia said he worried the ruling will allow law enforcement to collect DNA samples for minor offenses.
The federal government and at least 26 states now allow DNA collection at arrest, reports Bloomberg News.
Photo by iStockPhoto.com
Related Articles:
If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!
Related Content
Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century
This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!
