Hospital Crime Survey: Violent Crime Rate Edged Up Slightly Last Year

The hospital security survey also found more significant increases in assaults, disorderly conduct and theft.

The overall violent crime rate at U.S. hospitals last year increased slightly compared to the previous year according to the International Association for Healthcare Security and Safety (IAHSS) Foundation’s latest crime survey. The results, which were announced at the IAHSS annual conference held this week in Vancouver, B.C., Canada, showed that the rate of violent crime per 100 beds was 1.0 last year. Although that is up from 2015, in which the rate was .9, it still is way down from the 2014 rate of 2.8 per 100 beds.

Other types of crimes did see a more significant increase compared to 2015. The assault rate increased from 8.1 per 100 beds in 2015 to 9.3 last year. Disorderly conduct went up by 12.7; theft by 2.3; vandalism by .9; burglary by .2; and motor vehicle theft by .1.

View the charts.

Type 2 workplace violence (patient-on-staff or visitor-on-staff violence) accounted for 85 percent of all aggravated assaults and 91 percent of all assaults. However, according to Bonnie Michaelman of Massachusetts General Hospital, employee-on-employee (type 3) violence has decreased, and she attributed that progress to the work of hospital security departments.

“Background screening has gotten that much better, our tolerance for violence by employees has gotten much lower and our programs on workplace violence have gotten far more sophisticated,” Michaelman said. “That has really made a difference in the proportion of employee or former employee violence toward people in healthcare. We should be proud of that.”

Although Michaelman acknowledged that hospitals are still working on reducing violence perpetrated by visitors and patients, she said that target hardening has resulted in the low rate of type 1 workplace violence (violent acts by criminals), type 3 and type 4 workplace violence (violence committed in the workplace by someone who doesn’t work there but has a personal relationship with an employee – an abusive spouse or partner).

Michaelman also noted the probability that many crimes go unreported. Additionally, crimes like drug diversion and cyber attacks were not included in the data.

View the charts.

View the report.

If you appreciated this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author

robin hattersley headshot

Robin has been covering the security and campus law enforcement industries since 1998 and is a specialist in school, university and hospital security, public safety and emergency management, as well as emerging technologies and systems integration. She joined CS in 2005 and has authored award-winning editorial on campus law enforcement and security funding, officer recruitment and retention, access control, IP video, network integration, event management, crime trends, the Clery Act, Title IX compliance, sexual assault, dating abuse, emergency communications, incident management software and more. Robin has been featured on national and local media outlets and was formerly associate editor for the trade publication Security Sales & Integration. She obtained her undergraduate degree in history from California State University, Long Beach.

Leading in Turbulent Times: Effective Campus Public Safety Leadership for the 21st Century

This new webcast will discuss how campus public safety leaders can effectively incorporate Clery Act, Title IX, customer service, “helicopter” parents, emergency notification, town-gown relationships, brand management, Greek Life, student recruitment, faculty, and more into their roles and develop the necessary skills to successfully lead their departments. Register today to attend this free webcast!

Get Our Newsletters
Campus Safety Conference promo