The Crumbley Convictions: Who Should Be Held Responsible for School Shootings?
While we may be comforted by the pursuit and conviction of people based on vicarious liability, we may also be creating an injustice, one school safety expert warns.
While we may be comforted by the pursuit and conviction of people based on vicarious liability, we may also be creating an injustice, one school safety expert warns.
Both parents were found guilty of four counts of involuntary manslaughter and faced up to 15 years in prison for each count.
The Lehigh University study analyzed the profiles of 59 boys and men who carried out school shootings between 1966 and 2018.
Prosecutors largely focused on James Crumbley’s improper storage of the firearm his son used in the Oxford High School shooting.
Three police officers fired at the 16-year-old Pioneer Technology and Arts Academy student after he refused to put down his weapon.
The shooting happened in the school’s lower parking lot shortly after dismissal Wednesday.
Feb. 14 marked six years since 17 people were killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Here’s a reminder of acts of heroism seen that day.
Jennifer Crumbley is the first parent in the U.S. to be held responsible for their child carrying out a mass school shooting.
The shooter wrote he was “gearing up” in the bathroom and used a racial slur minutes before the deadly shooting.
After a teen was tragically shot and killed, the Yakima School District conducted an after-action review to determine failures and successes in its response.