Campus leaders are heading into 2026 with a tougher safety landscape and higher expectations. K-12 districts want schools that feel open but can lock down quickly. Healthcare campuses must protect sensitive clinical zones while welcoming the public. Colleges and universities manage large, mixed-use environments with steady visitor flow. Across all these settings, safety teams are being asked to respond faster, reduce risk more consistently, and prove compliance with less friction. Technology can help meet that demand, but only when it supports day-to-day operations instead of adding complexity.
A key shift already underway is convergence. Security, fire and life safety, and building automation have long been deployed as separate systems owned by different departments. During an incident, that separation slows verification and creates blind spots. During audits, it turns compliance into a paperwork chase.
RELATED: 2025 Year-in-Review: AI’s Impact on Campus Security Technology
In 2026, campuses that make the biggest gains will be the ones that treat safety as one connected ecosystem. Artificial intelligence will be a practical part of that ecosystem, filtering noise, highlighting true threats, and helping operators act with clarity.
Below are five trends shaping the next stage.
1. Converged Safety Platforms Become Standard
Video, access control, intrusion detection, and life safety are moving into unified platforms that provide a single operational view. These platforms increasingly connect through open APIs to build automation systems and campus IoT tools, so safety data can inform broader building decisions. Operators can confirm what is happening without switching between systems, and training becomes easier because staff learn one interface instead of several. Multi-site organizations gain consistency because policies and response playbooks can be applied across every building. The practical advice for campuses is to align early. Security, IT, facilities, and emergency management teams should agree on shared outcomes such as faster lockdown verification, clearer evacuation intelligence, or stronger after-hours coverage, then choose platforms that support those workflows without recreating silos.
2. AI at the Edge Delivers Practical Value
The most useful AI in 2026 is shifting to the device level. AI at the edge includes on camera analytics and controller side machine learning that detect anomalies in real time, reduce false alarms, and auto classify events so teams see priorities first. This matters because edge processing lowers dependence on perfect network conditions. Devices interpret activity locally and send only meaningful alerts upstream, which is valuable for wide campuses and older infrastructure. In K 12 schools, edge AI can flag propped doors, restricted area access, or unusual after-hours movement. In healthcare, it can support safer monitoring of public entrances and high-risk units while minimizing nuisance alerts. In logistics and support buildings, it strengthens perimeter awareness where staffing is thin. To get the value without creating new concerns, campuses should pair edge AI with privacy by design. Define retention windows, limit access by role, and document how analytics triggers will be used.
3. Zero-Trust Physical Identity Expands Campus-Wide
Campuses are beginning to treat access as a real-time trust decision instead of a static badge assignment. By 2026, expect broader use of mobile credentials, multi-factor authentication at sensitive doors, and automatic provisioning tied to HR or identity systems. The drivers are practical. Campus populations and permissions change constantly, sometimes daily. Substitute educators, visiting clinicians, contractors, student staff, and vendors rotate in and out. Zero trust workflows reduce gaps created by manual updates or outdated access lists, and they make it easier to revoke access the moment a role changes. The planning implication is that identity strategy should guide physical design. Entry control points, visitor screening, and staff-only circulation patterns work best when access rules and credential types are mapped early, not after devices are installed.
4. Digital Compliance and Remote Service Reshape Inspections
Compliance is moving from binders to dashboards. Fire and life safety testing is shifting toward sensor-verified checks, digital certificates, and remote diagnostics tied to central monitoring. For campuses, the payoff is threefold. Routine testing becomes less disruptive because fewer on-site visits are needed. Audit trails for NFPA and ICC compliance are cleaner and easier to retrieve. Remote visibility helps teams detect system degradation early and schedule proactive service instead of reacting to failures. The best way to prepare is to treat compliance data as part of daily operations, not a once-a-year scramble. Build inspection reporting and monitoring into the system from day one so readiness is continuously documented and easy to demonstrate.
5. GSOC Workflows and Safety Data Operations Mature
More multi-site districts, health systems, and university networks are centralizing safety operations in GSOC-style environments. These centers unify alarms, video, access activity, and service tickets under playbook-driven workflows. Centralization speeds coordination across sites, but in 2026, the next layer is measurement. Leaders want defensible metrics that demonstrate risk reduction and operational value. Response time trends, false alarm rates, incident frequency, hotspot mapping, and maintenance uptime are becoming standard indicators. When platforms are converged and AI-supported, these numbers can be captured automatically rather than assembled manually. The practical takeaway is that a GSOC is a workflow. Campuses should define response playbooks and reporting needs first, then select integrations that make those routines repeatable and measurable.
RELATED: AI Video Detection in Schools: How Automated Surveillance Reduces Emergency Response Time
3 Steps for Successful AI Systems Integration
These trends point to a clear direction. Campus safety systems in 2026 will be integrated, intelligent, and accountable. Three steps help leaders prepare now:
- Plan collaboratively across security, IT, facilities, and emergency management so convergence matches real operational ownership.
- Require interoperability and governance up front. AI and integration only help when retention rules, access roles, and privacy policies are defined and enforceable.
- Design for the full lifecycle, not just installation. Inspection, reporting, and centralized operations should be supported from day one.
AI is not replacing fundamentals like reliable detection, clear egress design, and disciplined response training. It is strengthening them by connecting systems, shrinking verification time, and producing clearer proof of compliance. Campuses that align technology with policy and daily workflow will be positioned to respond faster, reduce risk, and build trust through measurable safety outcomes.
Eric Benson is CEO of Benson Systems, a fire and life safety systems provider.
Note: The views expressed by guest bloggers and contributors are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, Campus Safety.
