A new report shows smoke detectors operate prior to sprinklers, giving occupants earlier indication of a fire, whereas sprinklers limit the spread of fire. Both should be included in any fire protection scheme. Photo: ©istockphoto.com
I just returned from the Fire Protection Research Foundation’s Suppression, Detection and Signaling Research and Applications Symposium, a.k.a. SUPDET. The four-day event devoted two days to the presentation of papers on detection and signaling followed by two covering suppression.
SUPDET serves as a forum to discuss leading-edge research into new technologies and practices related to fire protection engineering within the contexts of suppression, detection and signaling. The papers presented are not commercial in nature, but the research discussed can and does lead to new products in the future.
Related Article: 6 Helpful Hints to Keep in Mind When Selecting a Fire Alarm System
A variety of papers were presented this year within the field of detection and signaling, and it is key points from select submissions among those that I will highlight for you below. For a complete listing of all the papers, visit click here.
Smoke Detection Vs. Sprinkling
Comparative Loss of Life and Injury Analysis in Commercial, Industrial and Education Institution Housing was offered by Jim Milke, Ph.D., P.E., of the University of Maryland. The findings were the result of studies conducted on the performance of automatic fire sprinklers within an occupancy with no automatic detection as compared to the performance within an occupancy that has both an automatic fire sprinkler system and automatic detection.
SUPDET Serves as Life-Safety Think Tank
This year’s 17th annual Suppression, Detection and Signaling Research and Applications Symposium (SUPDET 2013) took place Feb. 26-March 1 in Orlando, Fla. Organized by NFPA, the agenda featured more than 25 papers, addressing the latest developments, advances and research on topics including the latest in:
- Detection research including cooking fire detection research, a new strategy to address the unwanted alarm issue, and detection of wild land fires
- Sprinkler protection strategies including lithium ion batteries and other high hazard challenges
- Clean agent technology research including a case study on a Halon replacement system at a military jet engine test facility
The event is aimed at professionals in the fire alarm, suppression and emergency communication industries. The symposium provides attendees the opportunity to exchange ideas, innovations and current research information. For more info, go to nfpa.org.
The study compared the number of casualties (fatal and nonfatal) within a number of occupancy types, looking at:
- Fully sprinklered-only occupancies
- Smoke detector-only occupancies
- Combination of sprinklered and smoke detector-protected occupancies
Previous studies conducted by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) had shown that, within commercial occupancies, 23% of reported fires were too small to actuate an automatic fire sprinkler system. In residential occupancies, it was found that 10% of the fires would not be large enough to trip the sprinkler system.
Related Article: Most Common Fire Alarm System Problems
Research conducted by NFPA has also shown sprinkler systems are effective in reducing the number of deaths. However, deaths still do occur, with the majority being either in the area of the fire or in close proximity to the blaze.
This new study showed that casualties also occurred within occupancies where smoke detection alone was present. The number of casualties in commercial occupancies was, however, less than in occupancies that only had sprinkler systems. Within industrial occupancies, this was reversed in that the higher number of casualties was found in buildings with smoke detectors alone as compared to those with just sprinklers. The assumption was that the fires at an industrial location tend to be larger than in commercial occupancies.
In both these occupancy types, there was not a reduction in casualties in those buildings that had both smoke detection and an automatic fire sprinkler system. It was the opinion of the author that where both were used, the building and the operations within may be of a more hazardous nature than one that only had a sprinkler system.
The study indicated there was a difference in the fires that were too small for a sprinkler system as compared to fires that were too small for a smoke detector. Thus, early warning of a fire could be provided by a smoke detection system or smoke alarms that a sprinkler system would not detect.
The research also looked at fires within multiple residential occupancies, such as college dormitories. As with the occupancies discussed above, the percentage of fires that was too small for a smoke detector to respond was less than the number of fires to which a sprinkler system would not activate.
The report concluded that smoke detectors operate prior to sprinklers, giving occupants earlier indication of a fire, whereas sprinklers limit the spread of fire. Both serve a purpose and should be included as part of any fire protection scheme.